USPTO serial 85978090
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Coral Gables, FL
Coral Gables, FL
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Justin H. Aida
Justin H. Aida Gordon & Rees LLP2211 Michelson DriveSuite 400Irvine, CA 92612| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Fragrances | ACTIVE | — |
| 006 | Holiday ornaments of common metal | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Sports eyewear; sunglasses; DVDs, CDs, CD-ROMs, sound recordings and video recordings featuring sports training, physical conditioning and football; computer game software, computer application software for mobile phones, namely, software for use in athletic training, physical conditioning and to provide content on football teams, scores and sporting events | ACTIVE | — |
| 014 | Jewelry, clocks, watches; cuff links, tie pins, ornamental pins, holiday ornaments of precious metal | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Money clips | ACTIVE | — |
| 018 | All purpose sport bags; All-purpose athletic bags; Athletic bags; Bags for sports; Daypacks; Golf umbrellas; Hiking bags; Shoe bags for travel; Umbrellas | ACTIVE | — |
| 026 | Belt buckles | ACTIVE | — |
| 027 | Gymnastic mats | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Entertainment services, namely, organization of exhibitions for cultural purposes; training services in the field of football, athletic conditioning and fitness; entertainment services, namely, organizing of sports competitions; entertainment services, namely, personal appearances by a sports celebrity; operation of sports camps | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 27, 2014 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 26, 2014 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 30, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2013 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 16, 2013 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 23, 2013 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 19, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 19, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 16, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 26, 2013 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 6, 2013 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 17, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 2, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 10, 2012 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 10, 2012 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2012 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 20, 2012 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2012 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 16, 2012 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 16, 2012 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2012 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 15, 2012 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 14, 2012 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 14, 2012 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 26, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 26, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 26, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 3, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 11, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 11, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 11, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 9, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 3, 2012 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 2, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |