USPTO serial 85978230
COCOADE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 14, 2013
- Examiner
- CHUO, EMILY M
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with COCOADE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Allan I. Zackler
Allan I. Zackler Wendel Rosen Black & Dean LLP1111 Broadway, 24th FloorOakland, CA 94607UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | Carbonated waters; Coconut water; Coconut-based beverages; Coconut-based non-alcoholic beverages; Energy drinks; Essences for making non-alcoholic beverages; Flavoured waters; Fruit drinks; Fruit drinks and fruit juices; Fruit juices; Non-alcoholic beverages containing fruit juices; Non-alcoholic beverages, namely, carbonated beverages; Non-alcoholic cocktails; Non-alcoholic fruit extracts used in the preparation of beverages; Non-alcoholic fruit juice beverages; Sports drinks; Sports drinks, namely, energy drinks; Vegetable drinks | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 18, 2012 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 20, 2019 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 14, 2018 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2017 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 26, 2016 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 26, 2016 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 14, 2013 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Apr 8, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 1, 2013 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 21, 2013 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 20, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 20, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 20, 2013 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 20, 2013 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 27, 2013 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 26, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 14, 2012 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2012 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 12, 2012 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 12, 2012 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 7, 2012 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 6, 2012 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 5, 2012 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 5, 2012 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 5, 2012 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 31, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 31, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 31, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 30, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 20, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 17, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |