USPTO serial 85978451
SUNBEAM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 5, 2013
- Examiner
- BUTTON, JENNIFER JO
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SUNBEAM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Adrian Lee
Adrian Lee Newell Brands Inc.2381 Executive Center DriveBoca Raton, FL 33431UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | Animal clippers, animal nail grinders | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 31, 2012 |
| 009 | Electric fences and ultrasonic sensors for indoor and outdoor use | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 30, 2011 |
| 018 | Bark control devices, namely, electronic collars for dogs, training leads for animals | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 30, 2011 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Sunbeam Products, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Sunbeam Products, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Sunbeam Products, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 008
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Similar marks named SUNBEAM
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 11, 2019 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 30, 2018 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 30, 2018 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 5, 2013 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 29, 2013 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2013 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 24, 2013 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2013 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 23, 2013 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 23, 2013 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 8, 2013 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2013 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 8, 2013 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jan 8, 2013 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 9, 2012 | UNTD | REQUEST TO DIVIDE UNTIMELY, REFUSED, OR WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 31, 2012 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 31, 2012 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 10, 2012 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 15, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 25, 2012 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 9, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 9, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 19, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 19, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 19, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 19, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 27, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 26, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 19, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 3, 2011 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |