USPTO serial 85979273
FAMILIA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RHIM, ANDREW
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FAMILIA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Medellin, Antioquia, CO
Medellin, Antioquia, CO
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Humberto Rubio
HUMBERTO RUBIO GLOBAL IP SERVICES8950 SW 74TH CT STE 1804MIAMI, FL 33156-3177UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Baby lotion; Bath lotion; Bathing lotions; Beauty lotions; Cosmetic preparations for bath and shower; Cosmetics; Deodorant for personal use; Depilatory preparations; Essential oils; Face and body lotions; Facial lotion; Hair lotions; Make up removing preparations; Make-up remover; Make-up removing lotions; Massage lotions; Nail care preparations; Nail polish remover; Perfumes; Pre-moistened cosmetic towelettes; Skin lotions; Soaps for body care; Soaps for personal use; Soaps for toilet purposes; Tissues impregnated with cosmetic lotions | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 21, 2017 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 21, 2017 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 20, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2017 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 28, 2017 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2017 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Apr 27, 2017 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 27, 2017 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 27, 2017 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 27, 2017 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 23, 2017 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2016 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 20, 2016 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 19, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2016 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 23, 2016 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2016 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Feb 22, 2016 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 22, 2016 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 22, 2016 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 22, 2016 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 20, 2016 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2015 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 12, 2015 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2015 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Aug 11, 2015 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 11, 2015 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 20, 2015 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 20, 2015 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 25, 2014 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 25, 2014 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 5, 2014 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 16, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 16, 2014 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 16, 2014 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2014 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2014 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 16, 2014 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 30, 2014 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Sep 18, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 18, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 3, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 3, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 3, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 2, 2014 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 2, 2014 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 29, 2014 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Aug 21, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 21, 2014 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 11, 2014 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2014 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 11, 2014 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 11, 2014 | RFTP | REMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS | — |
| May 14, 2013 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| May 13, 2013 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 10, 2013 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 24, 2013 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 24, 2013 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 26, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 26, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 26, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 24, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 12, 2012 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 6, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |