USPTO serial 85979466
HILMOR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4377815Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 30, 2013
- Examiner
- NELSON, EDWARD
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 100 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with HILMOR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Duluth, GA
Atlanta, GA
Atlanta, GA
Atlanta, GA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brian R. McGinley
Brian R. McGinley Dentons US LLPWacker Drive Station, Willis TowerP.O. Box 061080Chicago, IL 60606-1080Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | Hand tools, namely, tube cutters tube benders; tube expanders; swage block; swaging punch; screwdrivers; nut setters; nut drivers; wrenches; punch wrenches; clamps; fin comb straightening tools; sheet metal cutters; aviation snips; offset snips; tin snips; hammers; valve core removers; flaring tool kits comprising flare yoke and block and flare attachment heads; flaring tool kits comprising flare yoke and block and flare attachment head and tube cutter and tube reamer; flaring tool kits comprising flare yoke and block and swaging punch attachment; tube expander kits comprising tube expander and expander handle head attachments; cross bow bender kits comprising cross bow tube bender and mandrel head attachments | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 28, 2013 |
| 009 | Refrigeration gauges; micron vacuum gauges; thermometers; infared thermometer; infared thermometer; clamp on meters for measuring electrical voltage; anemometers; scales; refrigerant leak detectors; airflow meters namely, electric meters for measuring air flow; thermocouples; inspecting mirrors with telescopic handles for inspecting hard to see areas within air-conditioners, heat pumps, refrigerators and structural parts therefor | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 28, 2013 |
| 011 | Refrigeration manifolds; flashlights | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 28, 2013 |
| 018 | Carry all bags, namely, soft sided tool storage bags sold empty | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 28, 2013 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by DIVERSITECH CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by Irwin Industrial Tool company
- Other trademarks owned by Irwin Industrial Tool company
- Other trademarks owned by Irwin Industrial Tool company
- Other trademarks in Class 008
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Similar marks named HILMOR
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 30, 2020 | PCBM | PETITION TO DIRECTOR WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 30, 2020 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Jun 12, 2020 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Mar 18, 2020 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 14, 2020 | NCS8 | NOTICE OF CANCELLATION SEC. 8 EMAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2020 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jul 10, 2019 | PR23 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| Jul 3, 2019 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 1, 2019 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| May 23, 2019 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| May 23, 2019 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 22, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 22, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 7, 2018 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jul 30, 2018 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| May 23, 2017 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 23, 2017 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 22, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 30, 2013 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 28, 2013 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2013 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 25, 2013 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 18, 2013 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 18, 2013 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 20, 2013 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 20, 2013 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| May 20, 2013 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| May 20, 2013 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 11, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2013 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 4, 2013 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 15, 2013 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2013 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Mar 15, 2013 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 15, 2013 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 11, 2013 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 11, 2013 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 9, 2013 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2012 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 30, 2012 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 27, 2012 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2012 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Aug 27, 2012 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 27, 2012 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 9, 2012 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2012 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 1, 2012 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 9, 2011 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 14, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 6, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 26, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 13, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 11, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 11, 2011 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2011 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 24, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 24, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 24, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 22, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 22, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 22, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 1, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 1, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 1, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 4, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 4, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 4, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 1, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 10, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 10, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |