USPTO serial 85981000
IVFMD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KAVEESHVAR, JUHI
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with IVFMD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
heidi tandy
HEIDI TANDY Price Benowitz1691 Michigan AveSuite 360Miami Beach, FL 33139Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 044 | Human fertility treatment services; Medical services; Medical services, namely, in vitro fertilization; medical testing services, namely, fitness evaluations and consulting services in the field of mental fitness; reproductive medicine services; gynecology services; cancer screening services; cancer diagnosis services; cancer patient support services, namely, fertility preservation services for male and female cancer patients; cancer survivor support services, namely, fertility preservation services for male and female cancer patients; obstetric services; nutritional therapy services; nutritional counseling services; nutritional analysis services in the nature of dietician services; human egg fertilization; ovarian health services; human egg donation; fertility, namely, reproductive endocrinology, andrology and infertility services; medical semen testing for diagnostic and treatment purposes; medical semen analysis for diagnostic and treatment purposes; sperm preps for Inter Uterine Insemination and In Vitro Fertilization, namely, sperm banks; tubal ligation services and medical services involved the reversal of tubal ligations; tubal health, namely, tubal laproscopic and minimally invasive surgery to Fallopian tubes; psychological and psychiatric testing services, evaluation services, counseling services, and support services, namely, psychological and psychiatric counseling; genetic testing for medical purposes and genetic counseling services; and contraceptive services, namely, implanation and removal of IUDs and Fallopian blocks and prescribing hormonal birth control | ABANDONED | Jan 1, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 2, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 2, 2015 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Nov 12, 2014 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 7, 2014 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 7, 2014 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Nov 7, 2014 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 7, 2014 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 17, 2014 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 17, 2014 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 17, 2014 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2014 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 28, 2014 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 9, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 30, 2014 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 30, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 30, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 30, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 29, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 11, 2014 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 11, 2014 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 11, 2014 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 11, 2014 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Feb 3, 2014 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 15, 2014 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 16, 2013 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 18, 2013 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 18, 2013 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 11, 2013 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2013 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 11, 2013 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 17, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 16, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 16, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 6, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 6, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 6, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 16, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 16, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 16, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 16, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 16, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 16, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 16, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 8, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 5, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |