USPTO serial 85981284
MENUMAX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 1, 2014
- Examiner
- HAYES, GINA CLARK
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MENUMAX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Concept Development Associates, Inc.
St. Augustine, FL
Other trademarks owned by Concept Development Associates, Inc.
Concept Development Associates, Inc.
St. Augustine, FL
Other trademarks owned by Concept Development Associates, Inc.
Concept Development Associates, Inc.
St. Augustine, FL
Other trademarks owned by Concept Development Associates, Inc.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Terrence P. Conner
Terrence P. Conner Thoits Law400 Main St., Suite 250Los Altos, CA 94022UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | On-line library services, namely, providing electronic library services which feature culinary training videos via an on-line computer network; Providing an online non-downloadable computer database featuring a searchable collection of recipes, ingredients, culinary glossaries, food products and culinary training videos | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 18, 2010 |
| 042 | Providing on-line non-downloadable recipe management computer program for managing recipes, downloading recipes, and for recipe scaling, ingredients, nutritional analysis, unit conversions, costing, glossaries, equipment, shopping lists and recipe sharing; providing on-line non-downloadable recipe management computer software for managing recipes, downloading recipes, and for recipe scaling, ingredients, nutritional analysis, unit conversions, costing, glossaries, equipment, shopping lists and recipe sharing; Computer compatibility services, namely, data mapping between recipe ingredient databases and branded recipe ingredient database, and between food product databases and branded food product databases | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 18, 2010 |
| 043 | Providing an online non-downloadable computer database featuring a searchable collection of recipes, ingredients, food products being substitutes for ingredients; providing an on-line non-downloadable recipe management computer database for managing recipes, and for recipe scaling, ingredients, managing nutritional analysis information for recipes, recipe measurement unit conversions, costing information for recipes, managing cooking equipment information, managing recipe shopping lists and recipe sharing, all in the nature of cooking information | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 18, 2010 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Concept Development Associates, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Concept Development Associates, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Concept Development Associates, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Other trademarks in Class 043
- Similar marks named MENUMAX
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 6, 2020 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 1, 2019 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2017 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 23, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 7, 2016 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 6, 2016 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 6, 2016 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 1, 2014 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 27, 2014 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2014 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 25, 2014 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 21, 2014 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2014 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 20, 2014 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 7, 2014 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2014 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 7, 2014 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 7, 2014 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jul 6, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2013 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 28, 2013 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 25, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2013 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 24, 2013 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 9, 2013 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 10, 2012 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 15, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 25, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 12, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 9, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 19, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 19, 2011 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 19, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 17, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 14, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 14, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 14, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 13, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 13, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 13, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 8, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 2, 2010 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 28, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |