USPTO serial 85981986
MABLOGIX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4804534Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 1, 2015
- Examiner
- EVANKO, PATRICIA MALESARDI
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MABLOGIX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Blacksburg, VA
Blacksburg, VA
BLACKSBURG, VA
Blacksburg, VA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Doyle Siever
Doyle Siever Precigen, Inc.20374 Seneca Meadows ParkwayGermantown, MD 20876UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 040 | Custom manufacturing and custom synthesis of antibodies and genetically engineered DNA expressing antibodies, biological organisms, cells, viruses, and special purpose cells to the specifications of others for scientific, research, medical, veterinary and laboratory use | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 20, 2013 |
| 042 | Development of new technology for others in the field of genetics, therapeutics and biotechnology; Development of products being antibodies and genetic therapies expressing antibodies to regulate, modulate, treat, prevent, and characterize disease states; Development of tools in the nature of biotechnological processes to regulate, modulate, and characterize disease states; Research and development services for others in the fields of biotechnology and antibody technology, namely, genetically engineering DNA, biological organisms, cells, viruses, and special purpose cells expressing antibodies for scientific, research, medical, veterinary and laboratory use; Scientific research and product development services for others in the pharmaceutical, biotechnology, and medical fields; Antibody technology and gene therapy services for others for product development and scientific research purposes, namely, antibody production, genetically engineering DNA expressing antibodies, biological organisms, cells, viruses, and special purpose cells for scientific, research, medical, veterinary and laboratory use | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 20, 2013 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Intrexon Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Intrexon Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by PRECIGEN, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Intrexon Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named MABLOGIX
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 7, 2024 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Feb 7, 2024 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Mar 11, 2022 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Sep 1, 2020 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2020 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - ADDRESS UPDATED | — |
| Apr 16, 2020 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Apr 16, 2020 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 16, 2020 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Apr 16, 2020 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 16, 2020 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 16, 2020 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 8, 2020 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 1, 2015 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 28, 2015 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 28, 2015 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE MAILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2015 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 27, 2015 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 27, 2015 | SNEA | SU-EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 27, 2015 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 27, 2015 | ISER | WITHDRAWN FROM ISSUE - EXAMINING ATTORNEY REQUEST | — |
| Jul 25, 2015 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2015 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 2, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 2, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 30, 2015 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 30, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 30, 2015 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 30, 2015 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 30, 2015 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 12, 2015 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2015 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 12, 2015 | CNFR | SU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 24, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 24, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 24, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 26, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 26, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 26, 2014 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 4, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2014 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 3, 2014 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 3, 2014 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 6, 2014 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 6, 2014 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 6, 2014 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| May 6, 2014 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| May 6, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 6, 2014 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Dec 18, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2013 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 9, 2013 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 9, 2013 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 1, 2013 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 7, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 5, 2013 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 5, 2013 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 5, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 6, 2012 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 11, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 22, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 7, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 23, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 20, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 19, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 19, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 14, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 14, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 14, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 12, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 5, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 2, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |