USPTO serial 85982082
FIT IT SOLUTIONS. SIMPLIFIED.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEE, DOUGLAS
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FIT IT SOLUTIONS. SIMPLIFIED.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jessica S. Sachs
JESSICA S SACHS HARNESS DICKEY & PIERCE PLC5445 CORPORATE DRIVE SUITE 200TROY, MI 48098UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Consultancy in relation to the design of home pages and Internet websites; rental and maintenance of electronic memory space for others, namely, hosting and maintenance of Internet sites for others and providing electronic storage locations for third parties; software development; updating of computer software; computer software design; computer programming; hardware and software consultancy; installation of computer programs; installation and maintenance of computer software, in particular in the field of cloud computing | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 11, 2016 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 24, 2016 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 24, 2016 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 4, 2016 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Aug 29, 2014 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 28, 2014 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 12, 2014 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2014 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2014 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 11, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 11, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 6, 2014 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2014 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 4, 2014 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 1, 2014 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 1, 2014 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 1, 2014 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 1, 2014 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 1, 2014 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 1, 2014 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 4, 2014 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2014 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 4, 2014 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 31, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 31, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 26, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 14, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 15, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 15, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 15, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 9, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 26, 2013 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 20, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |