USPTO serial 85982446
NEUROPRO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PHILLIPS, WENDELL SHARMAN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NEUROPRO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Vancouver, BC, CA
Vancouver, BC, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Wholesale distributorships featuring natural health products, nutritional supplements, herbal supplements; online retail store services featuring natural health products, nutritional supplements, herbal supplements; Retail store services featuring natural health products, nutritional supplements, herbal supplements; Retail services by direct solicitation by sales agents in the field of natural health products, nutritional supplements, herbal supplements; all the aforementioned for the prevention and treatment of neurodegenerative diseases, namely Parkinson's disease, Alzheimer's disease, Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, spinal cord injury, brain injury, promotion and maintenance of healthy neurons, memory, and cognitive function | ACTIVE | — |
| 044 | Consulting services in the fields of natural health products, nutritional supplements | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 1, 2015 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 1, 2015 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 28, 2014 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 2, 2014 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 2, 2014 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 13, 2014 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 29, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 17, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 16, 2014 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2014 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 15, 2014 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 14, 2014 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 14, 2014 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 14, 2014 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 11, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 10, 2014 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 10, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 10, 2014 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 10, 2014 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 14, 2014 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2014 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 14, 2014 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 24, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 23, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 23, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 24, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 24, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 24, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 16, 2013 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 14, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |