USPTO serial 85983351
COMMON CORE 360
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4693052Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 24, 2015
- Examiner
- RICHARDS, SUSAN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with COMMON CORE 360?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
School Improvement Network, Inc.
Midvale, UT
School Improvement Network, Inc.
Midvale, UT
SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT NETWORK, LLC
MIDVALE, UT
SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT NETWORK, LLC
MIDVALE, UT
FRONTLINE TECHNOLOGIES GROUP LLC
MALVERN, PA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Karen K. Won
Karen K. Won COOLEY LLP1299 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Suite 700WASHINGTON, DC 20004-2400UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Educational services, namely, providing an electronic library featuring non-downloadable videos in the field of education and professional development; educational services, namely, providing online and live training in the field of standards-based teaching and professional development, and distribution of printed and printable course materials in connection therewith; educational services, namely, providing educational courses in the field of standards-based teaching and professional development offered through online, non-downloadable videos and instructor assistance; providing on-line, non-downloadable publications in the nature of printed teaching materials, in the field of standards-based teaching and professional development; providing an Internet web site portal in the field of education and training for professional development in the field of education; providing an Internet web site featuring news and information in the field of education and training for professional development in the field of education | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by School Improvement Network, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by School Improvement Network, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT NETWORK, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT NETWORK, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by FRONTLINE TECHNOLOGIES GROUP LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named COMMON CORE 360
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 7, 2022 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Oct 1, 2021 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Feb 24, 2020 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2017 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 28, 2017 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 27, 2017 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Aug 9, 2017 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 21, 2016 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| Jun 21, 2016 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 24, 2015 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 23, 2015 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2015 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 20, 2015 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 20, 2015 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 16, 2015 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 15, 2014 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 22, 2014 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2014 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 22, 2014 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 22, 2014 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Oct 15, 2014 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Oct 8, 2014 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| May 6, 2014 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 11, 2014 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2014 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 19, 2014 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 24, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 31, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 28, 2013 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 28, 2013 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 24, 2013 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 22, 2013 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2013 | PGTT | PETITION GRANTED - TTAB APPEAL FILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2013 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jun 21, 2013 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 20, 2013 | EXNI | EXPARTE APPEAL TO BOARD NOT ENTERTAINED | — |
| Jun 19, 2013 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jun 17, 2013 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 17, 2013 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 17, 2013 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 17, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 14, 2013 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 14, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 16, 2012 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2012 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 16, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 21, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 20, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 20, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 21, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 21, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 21, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 18, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 14, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 10, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |