USPTO serial 85984012
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Örnsköldsvik, SE
Örnsköldsvik, SE
Örnsköldsvik, SE
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Scott S. Havlick
Scott S. Havlick Holland & Hart LLPP.O. Box 8749Denver, CO 80201UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | Air cushions, not for medical purposes, namely, mattress cushions, stadium cushions, neck support cushions; Air mattresses, not for medical purposes, namely, air mattresses for use when camping, inflatable mattresses for use when camping, and nap mats, Pillows; Bedding, except linen, namely, beds, bed pillows; Mattresses, Sleeping bags, Sleeping bags for camping; Bags specifically adapted for sleeping bags; Non-metal tent pegs | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 022 | Bags or sacks for the transport and storage of materials in bulk; Tents; Tent floors, namely, covers for protecting tent floors, vinyl ground cloths; Bags made of textile for the storage of tents; Bags made of textile material for packaging; Bags made of plastics materials for packaging; Ropes, Ropes for mountaineering; Nets, namely, camouflage nets, fishing nets, garden nets, tarpaulins; ground sheets; Windbreaks, namely, canvas tarpaulins for protection against wind, awnings not of metal, canvas canopies | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 17, 2023 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Sep 6, 2021 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2017 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 25, 2017 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 6, 2016 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 29, 2016 | FIXD | ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 29, 2016 | ERRR | ON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Jan 28, 2016 | DP1B | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; PROCEED TO REGISTRATION | — |
| Jan 28, 2016 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 8, 2015 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 20, 2015 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 9, 2015 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Nov 9, 2015 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 9, 2015 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 3, 2015 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| May 9, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2015 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 7, 2015 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 7, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 8, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 13, 2015 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 11, 2014 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 16, 2014 | CHPB | POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Oct 15, 2014 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Oct 9, 2014 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 16, 2014 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2014 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 27, 2014 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 6, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 4, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 1, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 1, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 1, 2014 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 14, 2014 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2014 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 13, 2014 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 11, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 6, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 15, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 15, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 15, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 8, 2013 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 8, 2013 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 8, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 8, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 18, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 18, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 18, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 18, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 27, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 27, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 27, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 18, 2012 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Sep 18, 2012 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Sep 18, 2012 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Sep 17, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 5, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 1, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |