USPTO serial 85984143
BUILT FOR IT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5110093Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 27, 2016
- Examiner
- KOZAK, EVIN L
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with BUILT FOR IT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jonathan M. Gelchinsky
JONATHAN M. GELCHINSKY FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRETT & DUNNER, LL901 NEW YORK AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20001-4432UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Testing and inspection of engines and machinery; testing, remote control, diagnosis and calibration of vehicles, equipment, and machines used for agriculture, compaction, construction, demolition, earth conditioning, earth contouring, earth moving, lifting, forestry, landscaping, lawn care, marine propulsion, material handling, mining, oil and gas production, paving, pipelaying, power generation, and road building and repair; testing, remote control, diagnosis and calibration of engines, power generation equipment, machine fleets, trucks, trucking fleets, and the remote control operation of machines via computer networks and the internet; rental of equipment, machines, and machine tools for use in mining exploration | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 28, 2013 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 7, 2023 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Dec 27, 2021 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 27, 2016 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 22, 2016 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2016 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 19, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 19, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 10, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 14, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 8, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 8, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 8, 2016 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 20, 2016 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 20, 2016 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 2, 2016 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 2, 2016 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| May 2, 2016 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| May 2, 2016 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 29, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2016 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 17, 2016 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 24, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2015 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 16, 2015 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 23, 2015 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2015 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 22, 2015 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 22, 2015 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 22, 2015 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 22, 2015 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 24, 2015 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 24, 2015 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 19, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2015 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 18, 2015 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 18, 2015 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 25, 2015 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 15, 2015 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2015 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 25, 2014 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 25, 2014 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 25, 2014 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2014 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 10, 2014 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 24, 2014 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 24, 2014 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 20, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2014 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 18, 2014 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 18, 2014 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 21, 2014 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2014 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 1, 2014 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 19, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 25, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 22, 2013 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 22, 2013 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 22, 2013 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 22, 2013 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 6, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 6, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 6, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 14, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 14, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 14, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 7, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 2, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 30, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |