USPTO serial 85984184
MIDAS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5041448Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 13, 2016
- Examiner
- CORDOVA, RAUL
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MIDAS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Identity Theft Guard Solutions, LLC
Portland, OR
Other trademarks owned by Identity Theft Guard Solutions, LLC
Identity Theft Guard Solutions, LLC
Portland, OR
Other trademarks owned by Identity Theft Guard Solutions, LLC
Identity Theft Guard Solutions, LLC
Portland, OR
Other trademarks owned by Identity Theft Guard Solutions, LLC
Identity Theft Guard Solutions, LLC
Portland, OR
Other trademarks owned by Identity Theft Guard Solutions, LLC
IDENTITY THEFT GUARD SOLUTIONS, INC.
PORTLAND, OR
Other trademarks owned by IDENTITY THEFT GUARD SOLUTIONS, INC.
IDENTITY THEFT GUARD SOLUTIONS, INC.
PORTLAND, OR
Other trademarks owned by IDENTITY THEFT GUARD SOLUTIONS, INC.
IDENTITY THEFT GUARD SOLUTIONS, INC.
PORTLAND, OR
Other trademarks owned by IDENTITY THEFT GUARD SOLUTIONS, INC.
IDENTITY THEFT GUARD SOLUTIONS, INC.
PORTLAND, OR
Other trademarks owned by IDENTITY THEFT GUARD SOLUTIONS, INC.
IDENTITY THEFT GUARD SOLUTIONS, INC.
PORTLAND, OR
Other trademarks owned by IDENTITY THEFT GUARD SOLUTIONS, INC.
IDENTITY THEFT GUARD SOLUTIONS, INC.
PORTLAND, OR
Other trademarks owned by IDENTITY THEFT GUARD SOLUTIONS, INC.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jefferson F. Scher
Jefferson F. Scher Carr & Ferrell LLP120 Constitution DriveMenlo Park, CA 94025UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software and mobile application software allowing consumers to monitor and review their medical transactions, health insurance charges, and insurance reimbursements; computer software and mobile application software allowing consumers to detect and report unauthorized or fraudulent medical transactions, health insurance charges, and insurance reimbursements | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 11, 2013 |
| 038 | Provision of e-mail alerts to consumers regarding medical financial transactions, health insurance charges, and insurance reimbursements | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 11, 2013 |
| 045 | Monitoring and reporting services in the fields of fraudulent transactions, identity theft, insurance fraud and financial crimes and providing advice, counseling and information thereon; remediation services, namely, legal and dispute resolution services in the fields of fraudulent transactions, identity theft, insurance fraud and financial crimes and providing advice, counseling and information thereon | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 11, 2013 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Identity Theft Guard Solutions, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Identity Theft Guard Solutions, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Identity Theft Guard Solutions, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Identity Theft Guard Solutions, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by IDENTITY THEFT GUARD SOLUTIONS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by IDENTITY THEFT GUARD SOLUTIONS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by IDENTITY THEFT GUARD SOLUTIONS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by IDENTITY THEFT GUARD SOLUTIONS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by IDENTITY THEFT GUARD SOLUTIONS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by IDENTITY THEFT GUARD SOLUTIONS, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named MIDAS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 24, 2023 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Sep 13, 2021 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2018 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 1, 2018 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 6, 2017 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Oct 26, 2017 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 26, 2017 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 12, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 13, 2016 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 6, 2016 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE MAILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2016 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 18, 2016 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 18, 2016 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 15, 2016 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 6, 2016 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 22, 2016 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2016 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 22, 2016 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 22, 2016 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Dec 15, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2015 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 11, 2015 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 23, 2015 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 28, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 8, 2015 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 20, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 19, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 10, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 9, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 9, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 9, 2014 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Sep 8, 2014 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Aug 18, 2014 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 29, 2014 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Jun 13, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 13, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 10, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 9, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 9, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 12, 2013 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Dec 11, 2013 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Dec 10, 2013 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 1, 2013 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Nov 16, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 15, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 15, 2013 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2013 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 14, 2013 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 12, 2013 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 8, 2013 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Oct 28, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 26, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 10, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 19, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 18, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 18, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 18, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 15, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 8, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 19, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 16, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |