USPTO serial 85984293
AQUAIVIA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DAWE III, WILLIAM H
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AQUAIVIA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Washington, DC
Washington, DC
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Eric G. Wright
ERIC G. WRIGHT WRIGHT IP & INTERNATIONAL LAW1101 NEW HAMPSHIRE AVE NW APT 612WASHINGTON, DC 20037-1503UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | educational campaigns | ACTIVE | May 29, 2017 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 28, 2017 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Jul 28, 2017 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2017 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 22, 2017 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 22, 2017 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 29, 2017 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 29, 2017 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| May 29, 2017 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| May 29, 2017 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Dec 9, 2016 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA MAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2016 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 6, 2016 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 6, 2016 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 9, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2016 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 6, 2016 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 9, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2016 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2016 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 8, 2016 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 5, 2016 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2016 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 5, 2016 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 5, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 7, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2016 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 14, 2015 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 2, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2015 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 20, 2015 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2015 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 19, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 19, 2015 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 12, 2015 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| May 12, 2015 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 24, 2015 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2015 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 16, 2015 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 16, 2015 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 19, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2014 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 17, 2014 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 4, 2014 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA MAILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2014 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 27, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 27, 2014 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 22, 2014 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 22, 2014 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 17, 2014 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 22, 2014 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 2, 2014 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 14, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 14, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 12, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 12, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 12, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 4, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 3, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 28, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 28, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 21, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 8, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 24, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 23, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 23, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 5, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 28, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |