USPTO serial 86000031
VIRTUAL GUARD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4607427Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 16, 2014
- Examiner
- BROWN, BARBARA TROFFKIN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with VIRTUAL GUARD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Daniel R. Kimbell
DANIEL R. KIMBELL KARISH & BJORGUMSTE 30716 N MARENGO AVEPASADENA, CA 91101Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Providing access to security video recordings in the fields of warehouses, office buildings, residential buildings, commercial buildings, warehouse building sites, office building sites, residential building sites, commercial building sites, land-based oil rigs, construction sites, demolition sites, bridges, security checkpoints, weigh stations, electrical substations, water treatment centers, waste treatment centers, dams, airports, parking lots, hydroelectric facilities, live entertainment events, live sporting events, live festivals, pipelines, railroad crossings, land-based vehicle roadways, ports-of-entry, border crossings via a global computer network | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 9, 2009 |
| 045 | Security services, namely, providing mobile, on-site electronic surveillance services for security purposes with interactive video monitoring and recording by means of video cameras in the fields of warehouses, office buildings, residential buildings, commercial buildings, warehouse building sites, office building sites, residential building sites, commercial building sites, land-based oil rigs, construction sites, demolition sites, bridges, security checkpoints, weigh stations, electrical substations, water treatment centers, waste treatment centers, dams, airports, parking lots, hydroelectric facilities, live entertainment events, live sporting events, live festivals, pipelines, railroad crossings, land-based vehicle roadways, ports-of-entry, and border crossings | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 9, 2009 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 23, 2021 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Sep 16, 2019 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| May 23, 2018 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Sep 16, 2014 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Aug 8, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 5, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 28, 2014 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 25, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 24, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 24, 2014 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 17, 2014 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2014 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 17, 2014 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 20, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 19, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 19, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 13, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 23, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 23, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 23, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 10, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 12, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 4, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |