USPTO serial 86000320
JET 2000
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RITTNER, HANNO I
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with JET 2000?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Kornwestheim, DE
Kornwestheim, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Paul D. Bianco
PAUL D. BIANCO FLEIT GIBBONS GUTMAN BONGINI & BIANCO PL21355 E DIXIE HWY STE 115MIAMI, FL 33180-1244UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | machines for providing and /or spraying liquids and paints, in particular airbrush guns and paint spray guns; fittings and spare parts for airbrush guns and paint spray guns, in particular paint reservoirs in the nature of attachments for paint supply storage; oil-water separators for pneumatic controls being part of machines; machine parts, namely, adaptors and couplings connecting liquid containers and paint containers and liquid supplies to machines for providing and or spraying liquids and paints | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 25, 2017 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 25, 2017 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 22, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2017 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 17, 2017 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 24, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2016 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2016 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 23, 2016 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 17, 2016 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2016 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 17, 2016 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 17, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 26, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2016 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 19, 2016 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 1, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2015 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 29, 2015 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 17, 2015 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 20, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2015 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 18, 2015 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 19, 2014 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 24, 2014 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 24, 2014 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 4, 2014 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 7, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 5, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 5, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 29, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 14, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 15, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 15, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 15, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 15, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 12, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 5, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |