USPTO serial 86001571
KUBIK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VAGHANI, MAYUR C
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with KUBIK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
9610 Nørager, DK
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lew Hansen
LEW HANSEN SHERIDAN ROSS PC1560 BROADWAY STE 1200DENVER, CO 80202-5145UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Loudspeakers and accessories, namely, loudspeaker drive units, loudspeaker enclosures, bass reflex ports, subwoofers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 12, 2015 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Mar 12, 2015 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2015 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 10, 2015 | EXDM | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED AS MOOT | — |
| Jan 5, 2015 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2015 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2015 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 3, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 3, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 26, 2014 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 26, 2014 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 26, 2014 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 26, 2014 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 29, 2014 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 29, 2014 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 29, 2014 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 15, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 15, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 6, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 21, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 22, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 22, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 22, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 16, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 16, 2013 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 6, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |