USPTO serial 86001604
FLAME GUARD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCCAULEY, BRENDAN D
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FLAME GUARD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Windsor, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CHRISTOPHER L. SOREY
CHRISTOPHER L. SOREY WYRICK ROBBINS YATES & PONTON, LLP4101 LAKE BOONE TRL STE 300RALEIGH, NC 27607-7525UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | candle holders | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 26, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 26, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 1, 2018 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2018 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2018 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 31, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 31, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 31, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 29, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 14, 2017 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 23, 2017 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2017 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2017 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 23, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 22, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 22, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 11, 2016 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 11, 2016 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2016 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 11, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 11, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 11, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 4, 2015 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 4, 2015 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2015 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 4, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 1, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 1, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 24, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 21, 2014 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 23, 2014 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2014 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 16, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 16, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 13, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 6, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |