USPTO serial 86001771
UINFINITY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CROMER, ZACHARY
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with UINFINITY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lisa W. Rosaya
LISA W ROSAYA BAKER & MCKENZIE LLP452 5TH AVENUENEW YORK, NY 10018-2706UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Medical apparatus and instruments, namely, electric heating devices for curative treatment; medical diagnostic apparatus, namely, fever thermometers; physiotherapy apparatus, namely, foam rollers; furniture especially made for medical purposes; orthopedic articles, namely, belts and braces; reflexology machines for medical purposes; massage apparatus; massage appliances, namely, electric vibrating massagers; electromedical rehabilitative and pain management products for clinical and home use, namely, nerve muscle stimulators; hand-held massagers; eye, body and foot massagers; massage chairs with built-in massage apparatus; kneading, massaging and tapping machines for medical use; apparatus for the therapeutic toning of the muscles for physical therapy purposes; apparatus for use in exercising muscles for medical use; cushions, mattresses and pillows adapted for medical purposes; pillows for orthopedic use; electric heating cushions and pads, for medical purposes; hot air therapeutic apparatus; electromedical and electrotherapy apparatus and instruments for slimming treatments; deep heat massage apparatus; electrically operated massagers; esthetic massage apparatus; gloves for massage; vibration generating apparatus for massage; motor vibrated massage apparatus; temperature monitors and sensors for stabilizing body temperature for medical use; thermometers for medical purposes; and parts and fittings for all the aforesaid goods; massage chairs; massage beds | ABANDONED | — |
| 020 | Furniture; massage tables; cushions; mattresses; pillows; neck-supporting pillows, other than for medical or surgical use; neck rolls, other than for medical or surgical use, in the nature of supporting pillows; reclining chairs; chairs; sofas | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 24, 2016 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 24, 2016 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 24, 2016 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 24, 2016 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 7, 2015 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 11, 2015 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 10, 2015 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 18, 2015 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 2, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 2, 2015 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 2, 2015 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2015 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2015 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 5, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 5, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 5, 2015 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 15, 2014 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2014 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 7, 2014 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 7, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 7, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 7, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 31, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 19, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 27, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 27, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 27, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 19, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 16, 2013 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 6, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |