Drawing for Serial No. 86002283

USPTO serial 86002283

Serial No. 86002283

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MONINGHOFF, KIM TERESA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 86002283?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Brendan M. Shortell

BRENDAN M. SHORTELL LAMBERT & ASSOCIATES92 STATE ST STE 200BOSTON, MA 02109-2004UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Clothing, namely, clothing for men, women, children and infants, namely, jackets, shirts, polo shirts, dresses, shorts, suits, skirts, coats, underwear, pajamas, socks, footwear, sports footwear, swimwear, ties, belts, scarves, and glovesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 20, 2015MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 20, 2015ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 16, 2014NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 22, 2014NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jul 22, 2014PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 2, 2014NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jun 19, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 13, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 12, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 12, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 11, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 30, 2014NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
May 30, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 30, 2014PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
May 30, 2014PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
May 14, 2014MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 14, 2014ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 16, 2013GEANNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Oct 16, 2013GEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Oct 16, 2013EPENCOMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION AUTOMATIC ENTRY—
Oct 16, 2013CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED—
Oct 16, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 16, 2013MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Jul 15, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 6, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance