Drawing for CLOUDWIZ

USPTO serial 86002784

CLOUDWIZ

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LEIPZIG, MARC J
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CLOUDWIZ?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Leonora Hoicka

Leonora Hoicka International Business Machines Corp.North Castle DriveIntellectual Property - TrademarksArmonk, NY 10504

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for the optimization of cloud capacity, comparison of cloud providers, and simulation of cloud migration plansACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 29, 2016MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 29, 2016ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 4, 2016ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 4, 2016REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 30, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 29, 2015EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Sep 28, 2015NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Sep 28, 2015TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Sep 28, 2015PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Sep 28, 2015PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Aug 31, 2015MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 31, 2015ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 28, 2015EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Feb 18, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 17, 2015EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Feb 6, 2015NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Feb 6, 2015TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Feb 6, 2015PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Feb 6, 2015PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jan 28, 2015EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Aug 27, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 26, 2014EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 20, 2014AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jul 25, 2014EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 25, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 18, 2014ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 18, 2014REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 28, 2014NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 3, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 13, 2013NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 24, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 17, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 17, 2013MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Jul 16, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 8, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance