USPTO serial 86002853
ROBIN POWERED
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DWYER, JOHN D
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ROBIN POWERED?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Perry J. Viscounty
Perry J. Viscounty Latham & Watkins LLP650 Town Center Drive, Suite 2000Costa Mesa, CA 92626UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electronic proximity sensors and switches; Optical sensors; Sensors for the determination of temperatures, positions and distances; Touchscreen sensors; Electronic data recorders; Electric or electronic sensors used to measure, collect, and track environmental, machine, and human variables; Electric or electronic sensors used to measure, collect, and track environmental, machine, and human variables, and to automate actions based on such variables; Computer software for data processing; Computer software for project management, automation management, customer relationship management (CRM) and content management systems (CMS); Computer software to facilitate data mining, data collection, data analysis, and data conversion; Computer software for database management; Computer software for electronic monitoring of human and machine behavior; Computer software for the automation of processes based on human and machine behavior; Computer software for predictive modeling; Computer software for adaptive marketing; Computer software used to measure, collect, and track environmental, machine, and human variables; Computer software used to measure, collect, and track environmental, machine, and human variables, and to automate actions based on such variables | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Data automation and collection services using computer software to evaluate, analyze and collect data on human and machine behavior; Online nondownloadable software for data processing; Online nondownloadable software for project management, customer relationship management (CRM) and content management systems (CMS); Online nondownloadable software to facilitate data mining, data collection, data analysis, and data conversion; Online nondownloadable software for electronic monitoring of human and machine behavior; Online nondownloadable software for database management; Online nondownloadable software for the automation of processes based on human and machine behavior; Online nondownloadable software for predictive modeling; Online nondownloadable software for adaptive marketing; Online nondownloadable software used to measure, collect, and track environmental, machine, and human variables; Online nondownloadable software used to measure, collect, and track environmental, machine, and human variables, and to automate actions based on such variables | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by One Mighty Roar LLC
- Other trademarks owned by One Mighty Roar LLC
- Other trademarks owned by ROBIN POWERED, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named ROBIN POWERED
- Prosecution event ARAA explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 8, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 8, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 19, 2016 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 19, 2016 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 6, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2016 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 2, 2016 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 14, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2015 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 6, 2015 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 24, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2015 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 12, 2015 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 5, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2014 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 4, 2014 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 11, 2014 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 6, 2014 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Feb 18, 2014 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 24, 2013 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 24, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 4, 2013 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 19, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 19, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 19, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 12, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 7, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 23, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 23, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 23, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 17, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 15, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 8, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |