Drawing for SUJA

USPTO serial 86003418

SUJA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WELLS, KELLEY L
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SUJA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

P. Randolph Finch Jr.

P. RANDOLPH FINCH JR. MARKS FINCH THORNTON & BAIRD, LLP4747 EXECUTIVE DR STE 700SAN DIEGO, CA 92121-3107UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030Artificial coffee; Artificial coffee and tea; Beverages made of coffee; Beverages made of tea; Beverages with a coffee base; Beverages with a tea base; Black tea; Caffeine-free coffee; Chai tea; Citron tea; Coffee; Coffee and artificial coffee; Coffee and coffee substitutes; Coffee and tea; Coffee based beverages; Coffee beverages with milk; Coffee substitutes; Coffee-based beverage containing milk; Coffee-based beverages; Coffee-based iced beverages; Fruit teas; Ginger tea; Ginseng tea; Green coffee; Iced coffee; Iced tea; Japanese green tea; Rooibos tea; Sage tea; Tea; Tea-based beverages; Tea-based beverages with fruit flavoring; Tea-based iced beveragesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 20, 2015MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 20, 2015ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 16, 2014NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 22, 2014NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jul 22, 2014PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 2, 2014NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jun 14, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 9, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 6, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 6, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 23, 2014ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Dec 1, 2013GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Dec 1, 2013GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 1, 2013CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 29, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 29, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 22, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 18, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 25, 2013GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 25, 2013GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 25, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 24, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 18, 2013MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Jul 17, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 9, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance