Drawing for PLANET LABS

USPTO serial 86003447

PLANET LABS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BENMAMAN, ALICE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PLANET LABS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert B. Burlingame

ROBERT B BURLINGAME PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN LLPPO BOX 2824SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94126-2824UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Satellites and structural parts thereofACTIVE—
039Launching and placing satellites for others; base station operations in the nature of launch and placement of satellites in prescribed orbit for others and ground station operations of satellites for othersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 23, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 23, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 21, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 20, 2017EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Dec 20, 2017AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Dec 18, 2017EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Dec 18, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 20, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 16, 2017EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jun 16, 2017EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jun 16, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 16, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 14, 2016EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Dec 14, 2016EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Dec 14, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 26, 2016NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Jul 26, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 25, 2016EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 25, 2016DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jul 21, 2016FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Jul 21, 2016FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Jul 11, 2016AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jun 16, 2016EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jun 16, 2016DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Jun 16, 2016ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Jun 16, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 18, 2016CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Feb 18, 2016COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Dec 18, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 16, 2015EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 16, 2015EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 16, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 16, 2015NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 21, 2015NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 21, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 1, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Mar 17, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 16, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 12, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 12, 2015XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 12, 2015GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 12, 2015GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 12, 2015CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Mar 10, 2015ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Feb 24, 2015PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Feb 6, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 4, 2015EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 4, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 2, 2015JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Dec 11, 2014GNS1NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED—
Dec 11, 2014GNSFSUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED—
Dec 11, 2014CFRCSUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN—
Nov 25, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 25, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 24, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 21, 2014ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Nov 21, 2014EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Nov 21, 2014JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 21, 2014EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
May 21, 2014GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
May 21, 2014GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 21, 2014CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 26, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 25, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 25, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 13, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 25, 2013GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 25, 2013GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 25, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 18, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 17, 2013MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Jul 16, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance