USPTO serial 86004358
STARTAG
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GOLDEN, LAURA DAWN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with STARTAG?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andrew McCormick
ANDREW MCCORMICK WINSLETT STUDNICKY MCCORMICK & BOMSER6 E 39TH ST FL 6NEW YORK, NY 10016-0112UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Providing online telecommunication facilities for real-time interaction between and among users of computers, mobile and handheld computers, and wired and wireless communication devices; transmission of messages via text message, email, instant messaging and a website on the internet in the field of approval ratings, ratings, market research, research, market surveys, surveys and recommendations; providing on-line electronic facilities for the transmission and receipt of messages and information to, from and among users concerning approval ratings and topics of general interest; providing an online facility for users to share information, content about themselves, their likes and dislikes and daily activities, to get feedback from other users, to form virtual communities, and to engage in social networking | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | providing online software platforms and tools for real-time interaction between and among users of computers, mobile and handheld computers, and wired and wireless communication devices; providing online electronic software platforms and creating and hosting online communities for the transmission and receipt of messages and information to, from and among users concerning approval ratings and topics of general interest; creating and hosting an online community for users to share information, content about themselves, their likes and dislikes and daily activities, to get feedback from other users, to form virtual communities, and to engage in social networking; providing online non-downloadable software and software applications to enable transmission, access, organization, and management of text messaging, instant messaging, online blog entries and information via the internet and other communications networks; providing non-downloadable software via the internet and wireless devices for accessing, sending, and receiving information related to approval ratings and recommendations and topics of general interest on a global computer network; providing non-downloadable software for computers, portable handheld digital electronic communication devices, mobile devices, and wired and wireless communication devices in the field of social networking, namely, that permits the rating of user-generated and user-defined topics, events, people, things, businesses, places, products and services and permits the searching and viewing of such ratings, all in real time; providing non-downloadable software for real-time delivery of data, messages, location, text and other information related to approval ratings and recommendations and topics of general interest; providing non-downloadable software to facilitate online advertising and promotion, namely, by connecting social network users with topics, events, people, businesses, products, services and each other, and for tracking users to provide strategy, insight, marketing and for predicting consumer behavior and market trends | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 6, 2015 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 6, 2015 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 8, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 8, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 8, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 16, 2014 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 10, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 21, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 21, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 21, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 2, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 1, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 1, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 1, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 1, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 1, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 18, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 18, 2013 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 11, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |