Drawing for CANNAVEST

USPTO serial 86004837

CANNAVEST

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BUSH, KAREN K
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CANNAVEST?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Marina A. Lewis

Marina A. Lewis Procopio, Cory, Hargreaves & Savitch LLP525 B Street, Suite 2200San Diego, CA 92101UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035On-line retail store services in the field of dietary and nutritional supplements, food stuffs and beverages, body care and toiletry products, and clothing; wholesale distributorship services featuring dietary and nutritional supplements, and food stuffs and beverages, body care and toiletry products and clothing; retail store services featuring dietary and nutritional supplements, and food stuffs and beverages, body care and toiletry products and clothing accessible on-line and by telephone, facsimile and mail orderACTIVE—
042Design, research and development of advanced hemp cultivation methods and hemp oil processing technologies for deployment in cannabinoid production facilities in the pharmaceutical, nutraceuticals and food products industries; developing technologies to improve plant growth, production and extraction technologies to maximize production of pharmaceutical grade plant extracts, packaging systems and post production processing in the cannabinoid biotechnology fieldACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 17, 2017MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 17, 2017ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 15, 2017ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 15, 2017REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 22, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 21, 2016EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Dec 9, 2016EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Dec 9, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 1, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 30, 2016EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jun 10, 2016EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jun 10, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 30, 2016ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Mar 23, 2016EPPATEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Feb 13, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 12, 2016EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Feb 3, 2016PCGRPETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED—
Feb 3, 2016APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Jan 8, 2016TPDRTEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED—
Dec 10, 2015EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Dec 10, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 18, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 17, 2015EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jun 10, 2015EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jun 10, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 10, 2015ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 10, 2015REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 5, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 4, 2015EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 30, 2015AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Dec 10, 2014EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 10, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 10, 2014NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 15, 2014NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 15, 2014PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 9, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 26, 2014NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Mar 7, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 7, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 18, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 11, 2014CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Feb 11, 2014COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Jan 28, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 27, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 27, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 25, 2013GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 25, 2013GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 25, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 24, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 18, 2013MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Jul 17, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 11, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance