USPTO serial 86005874
GIRLPOP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LE, KHANH M
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GIRLPOP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Ville St-Laurent, QUEB, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard Y. Kim
RICHARD Y. KIM MCDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP500 N CAPITOL ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20001-1531UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothing, namely, t-shirts, sweat shirts, tank tops, night shirts, boxer shorts, jogging suits, fleece pants, fleece shorts, jersey shorts, jersey pants, nylon shorts, woven shorts and woven pants; outerwear, namely, rain coats, ski jackets, snow suits, nylon shells, squall jackets, bomber jackets, jean jackets, leather jackets, wool jackets, sleepwear and nightwear; headwear, namely, baseball caps, painter caps, tuques, ear muffs; denimwear, namely, jeans, overalls, jean shorts, jean skirts, jean shirts | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Consulting services with respect to in-store displaying of merchandise to maximize sales and exposure of product; retail store merchandise display and window display arrangement services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 11, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 11, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 14, 2017 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2017 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2017 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 23, 2017 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 22, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 16, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 16, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 9, 2016 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 12, 2016 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2016 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 25, 2016 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 17, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 16, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 16, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 13, 2015 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 27, 2015 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2015 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 12, 2015 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 9, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 25, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 25, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 18, 2014 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 30, 2014 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 30, 2014 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 30, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 12, 2014 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 12, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 25, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 24, 2013 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 24, 2013 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2013 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2013 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 21, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 21, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 21, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 21, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 19, 2013 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 12, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |