USPTO serial 86009222
AZYMAB
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAM, HAI-LY HUYNH
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AZYMAB?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
British Columbia, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Rochelle D. Alpert
ROCHELLE D. ALPERT MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP1 MARKET SPEAR STREET TOWERSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Therapeutic, prophylactic preparations, and pharmaceutical products and agents for the treatment or prophylaxis of human diseases, disorders and conditions, namely, cancer, autoimmune and inflammatory diseases | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Scientific research and development of preparations, agents and technology for the development of antibody therapeutics all for the treatment and prophylaxis of human diseases, disorders and conditions, namely, cancer, autoimmune and inflammatory diseases; providing scientific information to scientists, physicians and health care providers in the field of cancer, autoimmune diseases, inflammatory diseases, and infectious diseases | ACTIVE | — |
| 045 | Licensing of proprietary intellectual property | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 9, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 9, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 13, 2019 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2019 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2019 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 12, 2019 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 31, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 20, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 20, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 6, 2018 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 28, 2018 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2018 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2018 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 26, 2018 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 15, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 1, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 1, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 28, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 26, 2017 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 31, 2016 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 31, 2016 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 31, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 29, 2016 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 29, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 17, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 17, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 9, 2016 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 18, 2015 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2015 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 17, 2015 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 12, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 27, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 27, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 22, 2015 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 27, 2014 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 27, 2014 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 27, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 21, 2014 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 21, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 21, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 21, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 21, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 21, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 13, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 28, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 29, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 29, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 29, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 24, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 20, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 16, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |