USPTO serial 86010644
COMPLETE CARE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CRAWFORD, MARY
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with COMPLETE CARE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Buena Park, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ketan S. Vakil
KETAN S VAKIL SNELL & WILMER LLP600 ANTON BLVDSUTE 1400COSTA MESA, CA 92626-7689Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | Dental floss | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 9, 2015 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 8, 2015 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 8, 2015 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 24, 2015 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jun 4, 2015 | RBFT | REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES | — |
| May 14, 2015 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2015 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2015 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 18, 2015 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 12, 2014 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2014 | GNSF | SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2014 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 1, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 1, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 24, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 21, 2014 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 21, 2014 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 21, 2014 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 21, 2014 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 21, 2014 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 21, 2014 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 21, 2014 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 30, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 29, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 29, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 15, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 29, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 28, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 28, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 22, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 18, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |