USPTO serial 86011285
SHINE 'N' SHIELD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FIORELLI, JOANNA ELISA-HOLGUI
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SHINE 'N' SHIELD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joseph S. Heino
JOSEPH S HEINO DAVIS & KUELTHAU SC111 EAST KILBOURN AVENUESUITE 1400MILWAUKEE, WI 53202-6613Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | car wash services | ACTIVE | Aug 1, 2012 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 21, 2015 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 19, 2015 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 19, 2015 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 4, 2015 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Apr 7, 2015 | RBFT | REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES | — |
| Mar 13, 2015 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2015 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2015 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 17, 2015 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 17, 2014 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 17, 2014 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 16, 2014 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 16, 2014 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 16, 2014 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 6, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 5, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 5, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 4, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 4, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 4, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 29, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 24, 2013 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 19, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |