Drawing for DURANGO

USPTO serial 86012305

DURANGO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KERTGATE, AMY L
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DURANGO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Amy B. Berge

Amy B. Berge Middleton Reutlinger401 South Fourth StreetSuite 2600Louisville, KY 40202

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001cartridges sold filled with propylene glycol for electronic cigarettes; cartridges sold filled with vegetable glycerin for electronic cigarettesACTIVE—
009electronic cigarette batteriesACTIVE—
030cartridges sold filled with chemical flavorings in liquid form for electronic cigarettes; chemical flavorings in liquid form used to refill electronic cigarette cartridgesACTIVE—
034Electronic cigarettes; disposable electronic cigarettes; electronic cigarette flavor cartridges sold emptyACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 20, 2015MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 20, 2015ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 10, 2015ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 10, 2015REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 2, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 1, 2014EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 1, 2014AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Sep 18, 2014EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 18, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 18, 2014NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 21, 2014NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jan 21, 2014PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 1, 2014NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Dec 16, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 16, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 20, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 19, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 18, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 18, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 6, 2013GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Nov 6, 2013GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Nov 6, 2013CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Oct 31, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 30, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 23, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 20, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance