USPTO serial 86012973
VIOLET SAVAGE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FRYE, KIMBERLY
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VIOLET SAVAGE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Robert Savage and Nanette Lepore, U. S. citizens, parents of Violet Savage
New York, NY
Other trademarks owned by Robert Savage and Nanette Lepore, U. S. citizens, parents of Violet Savage
Robert Savage and Nanette Lepore, U. S. citizens, parents of Violet Savage
New York, NY
Other trademarks owned by Robert Savage and Nanette Lepore, U. S. citizens, parents of Violet Savage
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Howard D. Bader
HOWARD D. BADER BALLON STOLL BADER & NADLER, P.C.729 SEVENTH AVE STE 17NEW YORK, NY 10019-6887UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothing and apparel, namely, shirts, T-shirts, night shirts, rugby shirts, polo shirts, cardigans, jerseys, pants, trousers, suits, blazers, dress shirts, slacks, jeans, culottes, cargo pants, overalls, jumpers, jump suits, shorts, tops, tank tops, halter tops, sweat shirts, sweat shorts, sweat pants, wraps, warm-up suits, jogging suits, track suits, blouses, skirts, dresses, gowns, sweaters, vests, pullovers, parkas, capes, anoraks, ponchos, jackets, sports jackets, fleece jackets, coats, turtlenecks, beachwear, layettes, infant wear, infants sleepers, caps, swim caps, berets, hats, visors, headbands, wrist bands, sweat bands, headwear, ear muffs, scarves, bandanas, belts, suspenders, underwear, thermal underwear, swim and bathing trunks, bras, sports bras, brassieres, bustiers, corsets, panties, thongs, garters and garter belts, teddies, girdles, loungewear, robes, underclothes, pajamas, sleepwear, nightwear, night gowns, lingerie, camisoles, negligees, chemises, chemisettes, slips, sarongs, leg warmers, pantyhose, body stockings, knee highs, leggings, tights, leotards, body suits, unitards, gloves, mittens, rainwear, hosiery, socks, and swimwear; footwear, namely, sneakers, boots, galoshes, sandals, flip-flops, slippers, high heels, clogs and shoes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Robert Savage and Nanette Lepore, U. S. citizens, parents of Violet Savage
- Other trademarks owned by Robert Savage and Nanette Lepore, U. S. citizens, parents of Violet Savage
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named VIOLET SAVAGE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2, 2017 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 2, 2017 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 1, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2017 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 23, 2017 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 18, 2017 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 13, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2016 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 11, 2016 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 16, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2016 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 12, 2016 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 25, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2015 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 21, 2015 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 27, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2015 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 25, 2015 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 26, 2014 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 1, 2014 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2014 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 11, 2014 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 29, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 22, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 20, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 20, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 13, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 28, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 31, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 31, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 31, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 30, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 24, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 20, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |