USPTO serial 86013278
CAMPLEX RETRACTORCAM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KEATING, MICHAEL P
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CAMPLEX RETRACTORCAM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brigette B. Chaput
BRIGETTE B. CHAPUT KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR, LLP14TH FL2040 MAIN STIRVINE, CA 92614Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Surgical devices and instruments; surgical retractors; surgical tools in the nature of reposable surgical instruments, surgical tools having surgical cameras, and surgical tools used in connection with surgical imaging devices; hydraulic systems comprised of hydraulic components, pneumatic components, and interchangeable medical apparatus for use in connection with surgical devices, and medical instruments and surgery, namely, hydraulic-operated surgical tools, and hydraulics for surgical cameras; operating room display systems consisting of display, computers for providing viewing images of surgical site for use for a surgical procedure, and graphic user interface (GUI); surgical imaging systems comprising surgical cameras, displays, computers for viewing images of surgical instruments and graphic user interfaces (GUI); surgical imaging products, namely, cameras sold as a component of surgical instruments, cameras supported on a retractor-based platform for use in connection with surgeries, cameras supported on a surgical instrument for use in connection with surgeries, cameras for viewing surgical site, and surgical cameras; surgical sensor modules, namely, sensors being parts of surgical instruments, sensors supported on surgical instruments, sensors for viewing surgical sites, and surgical sensors; graphic user interface (GUI) for use with surgical devices and instruments; all of the foregoing relating only to medical or surgical devices and instruments | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CAMPLEX, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by CAMPLEX, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by CamPlex, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Similar marks named CAMPLEX RETRACTORCAM
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 10, 2017 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 9, 2017 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 21, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2017 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 17, 2017 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 12, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2016 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 3, 2016 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 17, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2016 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 12, 2016 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 11, 2016 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 8, 2015 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 14, 2015 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 24, 2015 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 5, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 14, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 14, 2015 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 14, 2015 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2015 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2015 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 14, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 14, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 14, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 12, 2014 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 5, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 4, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 4, 2014 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 13, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 13, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 13, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 30, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 29, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 29, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 30, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 30, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 30, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 30, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 25, 2013 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 20, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |