USPTO serial 86013842
SCHLEPPER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CASE, LEIGH CAROLINE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 118- EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SCHLEPPER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Amy B. Spagnole-DeRosa
AMY B SPAGNOLE-DEROSA MCDONALD HOPKINS LLC600 SUPERIOR AVE ESUITE 2100CLEVELAND, OH 44114-2690Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | Shoulder straps; all purpose leather or woven straps; straps for carrying a variety of items namely, tote bags, shopping bags, book bags, briefcases, luggage, sports bags, holdalls, carryalls, carrying cases, all purpose bags | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 29, 2015 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 27, 2015 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 27, 2015 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 16, 2015 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Dec 29, 2014 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 29, 2014 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 29, 2014 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 3, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 3, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 26, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 24, 2014 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 24, 2014 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 24, 2014 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 24, 2014 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 24, 2014 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 24, 2014 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 24, 2014 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 3, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 2, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 2, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 2, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 2, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 2, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 31, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 24, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 22, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |