USPTO serial 86014888
MILIFE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- REEVES, APRIL ELIZABETH
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 124 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MILIFE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Daniel Daniele
Daniel Daniele Norton Rose Fulbright Canada LLP / S.E.N.C.R.L., sSuite 3800, 200 Bay StreetRoyal Bank Plaza, South TowerToronto, Ontario, M5J2Z4Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Insurance services, namely, underwriting, issuance and administration of life, accidental death, dismemberment, disability, health, medical, dental, and universal life insurance | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 5, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 5, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 6, 2017 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2017 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2017 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 25, 2017 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 30, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 29, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 29, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 28, 2016 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 30, 2015 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2015 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 21, 2015 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 9, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 5, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 5, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 29, 2015 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 12, 2014 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2014 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 21, 2014 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 20, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 20, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 20, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 20, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 20, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 15, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 1, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 23, 2014 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 23, 2014 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 4, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 4, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 4, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 2, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 26, 2013 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 23, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |