Drawing for RAZRBAR

USPTO serial 86015114

RAZRBAR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
EINSTEIN, MATTHEW T
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RAZRBAR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Thomas J. Kent, Jr., Esq.

Thomas J. Kent, Jr., Esq. Saxton & Stump100 Deerfield Lane, Suite 240Malvern, PA 19355UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003After shave lotions; After-shave; After-shave balms; After-shave creams; After-shave emulsions; After-shave gel; After-shave liquid; Hair shampoos and conditioners; Massage lotions; Massage oil; Massage waxes; Pre-shave creams; Pre-shave liquid; Shampoos; Shave creams; Shaving balm; Shaving foam; Shaving gels; Shaving lotionACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 17, 2022TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 17, 2022ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 17, 2022REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 8, 2014MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 8, 2014ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 5, 2014NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Aug 2, 2014DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jul 25, 2014AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jun 23, 2014DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Jun 23, 2014ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Feb 4, 2014NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 10, 2013NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Dec 10, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 20, 2013NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Nov 1, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 1, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 26, 2013MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Jul 25, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 23, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance