USPTO serial 86016029
LOCAL KNOWLEDGE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MURRAY, DAVID T
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LOCAL KNOWLEDGE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
MARTINEZ, CA
MARTINEZ, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
PATRICK T. REILLY
PO BOX 7218SANTA CRUZ, CA 95061-7218UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | BUSINESS EVALUATIONS FOR OTHERS, NAMELY, PROVIDING CUSTOMER EVALUATIONS OF LOCAL BUSINESSES; BUSINESS EVALUATIONS FOR OTHERS, NAMELY, PROVIDING CUSTOMER EVALUATIONS IN RESPONSE TO A BUSINESS LOCATION SPECIFIC REQUEST; BUSINESS EVALUATIONS FOR OTHERS, NAMELY, PROVIDING INFORMATION IN RESPONSE TO A SITE-SPECIFIC REQUEST FOR CONSUMER EVALUATIONS OF A SERVICE PROVIDER OR A GOODS VENDOR; PROVIDING AN ONLINE COMMERCIAL INFORMATION DIRECTORY FEATURING BUSINESS SITES AND OFFICES OF OTHERS, NAMELY GOODS VENDORS AND SERVICE PROVIDERS, RELATIVE TO A SPECIFIED GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION; PROMOTIONAL SERVICES FOR BUSINESSES PROFESSIONALS AND INDIVIDUALS, for THE PURPOSE OF FACILITATING NETWORKING FOR BUSINESS VIA A GLOBAL COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK; PROMOTIONAL, MARKETING AND ADVERTISING SERVICES, NAMELY, PROMOTING, MARKETING AND ADVERTISING THE GOODS AND SERVICES OF OTHERS BY PROVIDING ELECTRONIC MESSAGING THAT FEATURES OFFERS TO PROVIDE GOODS AND SERVICES, COUPONS, CUSTOMER LOYALTY REWARD CARDS, AND CONSUMER PRODUCT AND SERVICE REVIEWS | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES, NAMELY, MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS DEVICE SERVICES THAT ENABLE SOCIAL NETWORKING BY BUSINESSES, PROFESSIONALS AND INDIVIDUALS; MOBILE TELEPHONY COMMUNICATIONS DEVICE SERVICES THAT ENABLE SHARING OF CONSUMER EVALUATIONS OF LOCAL BUSINESSES; WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES, NAMELY, MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS DEVICE SERVICES THAT ENABLE PROVIDING CUSTOMER EVALUATIONS OF LOCAL BUSINESSES; WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES, NAMELY, MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS DEVICE SERVICES THAT ENABLE PROVIDING CUSTOMER EVALUATIONS IN RESPONSE TO A LOCATION SPECIFIC REQUEST; WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES, NAMELY, MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS DEVICE SERVICES THAT ENABLE PROVIDING INFORMATION IN RESPONSE TO A SITE-SPECIFIC REQUEST FOR CONSUMER EVALUATIONS OF A SERVICE PROVIDER OR A GOODS VENDOR | ACTIVE | — |
| 045 | ONLINE SOCIAL NETWORKING SERVICES FOR BUSINESSES, PROFESSIONALS AND INDIVIDUALS, PROVIDED THROUGH COMMUNITY WEBSITES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MAINSTREETS
- Other trademarks owned by MAINSTREETS
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named LOCAL KNOWLEDGE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 23, 2016 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 23, 2016 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 5, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2015 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 3, 2015 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2015 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Dec 3, 2015 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 3, 2015 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 23, 2015 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 23, 2015 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 21, 2015 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2015 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 14, 2015 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 4, 2015 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2015 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2015 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jun 2, 2015 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 2, 2015 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| May 26, 2015 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 25, 2015 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 21, 2015 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2014 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 21, 2014 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 26, 2014 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 23, 2014 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 6, 2014 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 17, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 1, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 1, 2014 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 1, 2014 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2014 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2014 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 13, 2014 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2014 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 12, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 12, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 12, 2014 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 12, 2014 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 4, 2014 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 4, 2014 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 6, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 6, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 6, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 4, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 30, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 25, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |