USPTO serial 86017619
INGOT TECHNOLOGIES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RITTNER, HANNO I
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 119 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with INGOT TECHNOLOGIES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Aldergrove, BC, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert N. Cook
ROBERT N. COOK WHITHAM, CURTIS, CHRISTOFFERSON & COOK, P.C.11491 SUNSET HILLS RD STE 340RESTON, VA 20190-5244UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Mail order services featuring metal and non metal bag clamps and metal and non metal clips for storage bags; online retail ordering services featuring metal and non metal bag clamps and metal and non metal clips for storage bags; retail store services featuring metal and non metal bag clamps and metal and non metal clips for storage bags | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 16, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 16, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 18, 2018 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2018 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2018 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 17, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 19, 2016 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2016 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 14, 2016 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 3, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 3, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 3, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 31, 2016 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 30, 2015 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2015 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 27, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 27, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 27, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 27, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 27, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 20, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 18, 2015 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 26, 2014 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 26, 2014 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 26, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 19, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 16, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 16, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 16, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 18, 2013 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Nov 18, 2013 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Nov 18, 2013 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Nov 5, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 27, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 26, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |