USPTO serial 86018772
ACHIEVED WITH GOOD CHEMISTRY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHANG, ELIZABETH YI HSUAN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ACHIEVED WITH GOOD CHEMISTRY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Florham Park, NJ
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Edward T. White
EDWARD T. WHITE LECLAIRRYAN951 E BYRD STRICHMOND, VA 23219-4040UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Pharmaceutical preparations for the treatment of pain, women's health conditions, namely, pharmaceutical preparations for treatment of menstrual symptoms and menopausal conditions; pharmaceutical preparation for treating infections, namely, antibiotic preparations, anti-infectives, and pharmaceutical preparations for the treatment of infectious diseases; pharmaceutical preparations for treatment of cardiovascular conditions, diabetes, gastrointestinal disorders, and to promote digestion, and pharmaceutical preparations for the treatment of pediatric conditions, namely, ADHD and ADD; medications for pain relief | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 4, 2014 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Feb 4, 2014 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2014 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 3, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 29, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 17, 2014 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 7, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 7, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 7, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 3, 2014 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 3, 2014 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2014 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2014 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 11, 2013 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Nov 11, 2013 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Nov 11, 2013 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Nov 6, 2013 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 6, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 6, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 30, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 27, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |