Drawing for ACHIEVED WITH GOOD CHEMISTRY

USPTO serial 86018772

ACHIEVED WITH GOOD CHEMISTRY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CHANG, ELIZABETH YI HSUAN
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ACHIEVED WITH GOOD CHEMISTRY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Edward T. White

EDWARD T. WHITE LECLAIRRYAN951 E BYRD STRICHMOND, VA 23219-4040UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Pharmaceutical preparations for the treatment of pain, women's health conditions, namely, pharmaceutical preparations for treatment of menstrual symptoms and menopausal conditions; pharmaceutical preparation for treating infections, namely, antibiotic preparations, anti-infectives, and pharmaceutical preparations for the treatment of infectious diseases; pharmaceutical preparations for treatment of cardiovascular conditions, diabetes, gastrointestinal disorders, and to promote digestion, and pharmaceutical preparations for the treatment of pediatric conditions, namely, ADHD and ADD; medications for pain reliefACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 4, 2014MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Feb 4, 2014ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Feb 3, 2014ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Feb 3, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 29, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 17, 2014MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 7, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 7, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 7, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 3, 2014XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jan 3, 2014GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 3, 2014GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 3, 2014CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Nov 11, 2013GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Nov 11, 2013GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Nov 11, 2013CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Nov 6, 2013ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Nov 6, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 6, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 30, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 27, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance