USPTO serial 86019618
CLOUDHOUSE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 19, 2016
- Examiner
- LEHKER, DAWN FELDMAN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with CLOUDHOUSE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $748*
Plus Government fees of $1,700
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jill M. Pietrini, Esq.
Jill M. Pietrini, Esq. Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP1901 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 1600LOS ANGELES, CA 90067UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for enabling, facilitating and optimizing the transmission of data, information, messages, digital content, media content, software applications, geographical and location information over a global computer network, wide-area computer networks, local area networks, or peer-to-peer computer networks | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Software as a service (SAAS) services, namely, hosting software for use by others for enabling, facilitating and optimizing the transmission of data, information, messages, digital content, media content, software applications, geographical and location information over a global computer network, wide-area computer networks, local area networks, or peer-to-peer computer networks; consulting services in the field of software as a service (SAAS) or cloud computing service; software as a service (SAAS) or cloud computing services featuring a platform or software for enabling, facilitating and optimizing the transmission of data, information, messages, digital content, media content, software applications, geographical and location information over a global computer network, wide-area computer networks, local area networks, or peer-to-peer computer networks; application service provider featuring application programming interface (API) and software development kits (SDKs) software for use in deploying, monitoring, building, modifying, or enabling software applications | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Cloudhouse Technologies, Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Cloudhouse Technologies, Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Cloudhouse Technologies, Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named CLOUDHOUSE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 20, 2025 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2022 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2022 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Oct 31, 2022 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 29, 2022 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 19, 2016 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 11, 2016 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE MAILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2016 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 8, 2016 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 27, 2016 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 14, 2016 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2016 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 29, 2015 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 3, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 14, 2015 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 1, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 29, 2015 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 29, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 21, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 21, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 15, 2015 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 15, 2015 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 15, 2015 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 14, 2015 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 13, 2015 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 13, 2015 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 11, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 29, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 29, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 24, 2014 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 1, 2014 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 1, 2014 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 26, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 25, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 4, 2014 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 4, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 22, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 8, 2014 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 12, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 8, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 7, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 31, 2013 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jul 30, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 29, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |