Drawing for PRIVACY MASTER

USPTO serial 86022276

PRIVACY MASTER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LOOK, JEFFREY J
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PRIVACY MASTER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jie (Lisa) Li

Jie (Lisa) Li Greenberg Traurig, LLP4 Embarcadero Center Suite 3000San Francisco, CA 94111UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Software for mobile phones, namely, computer software for securing and managing user data on mobile phones; Software for tablet computers, namely, computer software for securing and managing user data on mobile phonesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 21, 2016MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 21, 2016ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 18, 2016ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 18, 2016REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 20, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 19, 2016EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Apr 13, 2016EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Apr 13, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 21, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 20, 2015EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Oct 13, 2015EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Oct 13, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 19, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 18, 2015EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
May 15, 2015AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Apr 13, 2015EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Apr 13, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 16, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 14, 2014EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 14, 2014EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 14, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 24, 2014TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 11, 2014ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 11, 2014REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 27, 2014ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Apr 15, 2014NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 18, 2014NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Feb 18, 2014PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 29, 2014NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jan 11, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 11, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 13, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 12, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 11, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 11, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 11, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 16, 2013GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Oct 16, 2013GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Oct 16, 2013CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Oct 9, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 14, 2013ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Aug 2, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 1, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance