Drawing for IGPS

USPTO serial 86022383

IGPS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MCCAULEY, BRENDAN D
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with IGPS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Rosaleen Chou

Rosaleen Chou KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON LLP1100 Peachtree Street, Suite 2800Mailstop: IP Docketing - 22Atlanta, GA 30309

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Wireless transceivers; remote radio head units employed as part of a wireless network for wireless transmission and reception; microwave and millimeter wave wireless backhaul systems comprising interface units and wireless transmission and reception units; wireless, optical and digital repeaters for wireless communications; distributed antenna systems comprising host units and remote units for wireless transmission and reception; virtualization software for wireless networks to manage and share radio resources among host units and remote units in a wireless network; distributed antenna systems optimization software comprising centralized and distributed algorithms to improve wireless network quality as part of a cellular access system; small cells for wireless transmission and reception, namely, low-powered radio access nodes; local real-time locating systems, namely, electronic devices that identify and track the location of objects and people in real time using radio frequency; all the foregoing goods related to an antenna system for providing cellular access and not for use in connection with horizontal boring and directional subsurface drillingACTIVE—
038Transmission of signals, namely, re-transmission of navigation signal including those of satellite and/or other terrestrial sources; transportation in the nature of transmission of wired radio signals or wireless signals in general from point-to-point, or point-to-multipoint; wireless signal processing in a heterogeneous network; all the foregoing services related to an antenna system for providing cellular access and not for use in connection with horizontal boring and directional subsurface drillingACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ARAA): This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 30, 2018ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 30, 2018REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 16, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 16, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 23, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 22, 2017EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Sep 6, 2017EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Sep 6, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 9, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 7, 2017EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Mar 7, 2017EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Mar 7, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 2, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 2, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 2, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 2, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 13, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 12, 2016EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Sep 6, 2016EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Sep 6, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 7, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 6, 2016EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Apr 6, 2016AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Mar 7, 2016EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Mar 7, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 10, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 8, 2015EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 8, 2015EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 8, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 10, 2015NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 13, 2015NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jan 13, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 24, 2014NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Dec 9, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 9, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 9, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 9, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 9, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 3, 2014ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Dec 3, 2014EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Dec 3, 2014JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Dec 3, 2014EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jun 3, 2014GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jun 3, 2014GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 3, 2014CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 15, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 14, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 14, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 14, 2013GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 14, 2013GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 14, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 12, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 2, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 1, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance