USPTO serial 86023383
EHRMANN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCCRAY, RENEE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EHRMANN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joyce B. Klemmer
JOYCE B. KLEMMER SMITH, GAMBRELL & RUSSELL, LLP1230 PEACHTREE ST NE STE 3100ATLANTA, GA 30309-3592UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Dietetic preparations for non-medical purposes, if included in class 29; milk and milk products, namely soured milk preparations, yoghurt preparations, kephir preparations (milk beverage), buttermilk preparations, cream preparations, whey preparations for nutritional purposes, beverages (milk or milk product predominating), milk beverages with fruit, fermented milk products (natural or flavoured), milk ferments (milk predominating), dried milk products for nutritional purposes, curd preparations, skimmed milk preparations, crème fraîche, butter, cheese , edible fats; desserts predominately of milk and/or yoghurt and/or cream, also using binding agents based on starch, the above goods also with added fruits, vegetables, herbs, spices, cereals, juices or extracts of the above-named additives and aromas, all of the above-named goods as fresh or longlife non-perishable ready-made products | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Dietetic preparations for non-medical purposes, if included in class 30; puddings, foods similar to puddings, desserts mainly of cereal preparations, also with added cream, milk, curd, fruits, juices or extracts from the above-named additives and aromas, also using binding agents based on starch, all of the above-named goods as fresh or longlife non-perishable ready-made products; Edible ices; predominately of yoghurt-based edible ices, ice cream, sherbets (ices), yoghurt (frozen) - (confectionery ices), flavoured ice; sauces, including dressings for salad | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | Whey beverages, non-alcoholic beverages with a low proportion of milk ferments; non-alcoholic beverages, preparations for making beverages, beverages as dietary supplements, if included in class 32 | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 25, 2014 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 25, 2014 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 27, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 27, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 27, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 25, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 5, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 2, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |