Drawing for CB OLD COUNTRY STORE

USPTO serial 86025940

CB OLD COUNTRY STORE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TWOHIG, SHANNON MARIE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 121

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CB OLD COUNTRY STORE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Felicia J. Boyd

FELICIA J. BOYD BARNES & THORNBURG LLP225 S 6TH ST STE 2800MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-4662UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030Gravy; Grits; Mixes for bakery goods containing cornmeal; Muffin mixes; Oatmeal; Seasoned coating mixtures for foodsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 18, 2017MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 18, 2017ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 7, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 6, 2017EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Feb 3, 2017EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Feb 3, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 11, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 10, 2016EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Aug 5, 2016EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Aug 5, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 17, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 16, 2016EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Feb 1, 2016EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Feb 1, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 1, 2015NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Sep 1, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 31, 2015EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 31, 2015DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Aug 31, 2015AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Aug 4, 2015EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Aug 4, 2015DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Aug 4, 2015ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Aug 4, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 23, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 21, 2015EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 21, 2015EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 21, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 4, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 12, 2014NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 17, 2014NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 17, 2014PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 28, 2014NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
May 13, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 12, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 30, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 21, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 21, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 21, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 23, 2013GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Nov 23, 2013GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Nov 23, 2013CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Nov 15, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 9, 2013MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Aug 8, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 5, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance