USPTO serial 86026128
TECHCARE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RAPPAPORT, SETH
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TECHCARE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kirk L. Deheck
KIRK L DEHECK BOYLE FREDRICKSON SC840 N PLANKINTON AVEMILWAUKEE, WI 53203-1802UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | MAINTENANCE OF RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL ENTERTAINMENT, AUDIO, VISUAL, LIGHTING AND SHADE SYSTEMS; INSTALLATION AND REMOVAL OF TEMPORARY REPLACEMENT EQUIPMENT FOR RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL ENTERTAINMENT, AUDIO, VISUAL, LIGHTING AND SHADE SYSTEMS; EXCLUDING COMPUTER HARDWARE, PERIPHERALS, AND NETWORK SYSTEMS | ACTIVE | Feb 1, 2009 |
| 042 | CALIBRATION OF RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL ENTERTAINMENT, AUDIO, VISUAL, LIGHTING AND SHADE SYSTEMS; EXCLUDING COMPUTER HARDWARE, PERIPHERALS, AND NETWORK SYSTEMS | ACTIVE | Feb 1, 2009 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2015 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 13, 2015 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 13, 2015 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 27, 2015 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Nov 25, 2014 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 25, 2014 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 25, 2014 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 24, 2014 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 24, 2014 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 24, 2014 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 24, 2014 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 23, 2014 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 23, 2014 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 23, 2014 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 22, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 21, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 21, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 21, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 21, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 21, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 15, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 9, 2013 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |