USPTO serial 86026619
DISTRICT8
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- QUIGLEY, LINDA MARIE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DISTRICT8?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Double Bay NSW 2028, AU
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey A. Smith
JEFFREY A. SMITH MILLEN, WHITE, ZELANO & BRANIGAN, P.C.2200 CLARENDON BLVD STE 1400ARLINGTON, VA 22201-3360UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable software and application software for facilitating online and local shopping and promotions, information regarding sales, for connecting retailers and consumers, and for enabling users to locate fashion stores, using global positioning systems (GPS) | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Advertising and marketing services provided by means of indirect methods of marketing communications, namely, social media, search engine marketing, inquiry marketing, internet marketing, mobile marketing, blogging and other forms of passive, sharable or viral communications channels; Providing a website for users with specific informed recommendations of specific consumer products and services, and specific retail stores and online retail stores, validated by the users' inputted preferences and social network; Providing a web site featuring the ratings, reviews and recommendations on products and services, retail stores and online retail stores, for commercial purposes posted by users; Shopping facilitation services, namely, providing an online comparison-shopping search engine for obtaining purchasing information; Providing an online directory information service featuring visual images and information regarding the fashion community and stores and online retail stores; Operating on-line marketplaces for sellers of goods and/or services; Facilitating the exchange and sale of services and products of third parties via computer and communication networks; Providing a website for connecting sellers with buyers; On-line service for connecting social network users with retailers for the purpose of facilitating discounted purchases; and Providing on-line information, news, newsfeeds and commentary in the field of retail and online stores and shopping alerts and updates | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
| 042 | Providing a website featuring a visual search engine containing fashion content; Providing a web site featuring technology that enables users to present products, services, and proposals to others for comment, and gather feedback from those others about those products, services, and proposals; Providing an interactive website featuring technology that allows users to filter search results regarding physical store locations and online store locations based upon a user's shopping needs and requirements, popularity of stores within said interactive website and other related search and filtering criterion; Providing temporary use of non-downloadable software applications for classifieds, virtual community, social networking, photo sharing, video sharing, and transmission of photographic images; Providing a web site over the Internet or electronic communications networks that gives computer users including online retail store providers the ability to upload, post, show, display and tag video clips and photographic images, text based information, and discount vouchers; Providing on-line computer databases and on-line searchable databases in the field of a virtual community relating to fashion; Computer services, namely, creating on-line virtual communities for registered users, retail store owners and online retail store service providers to organize groups and events, participate in discussions, and engage in social, business and community networking in the field of fashion; Platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms used in connection with an on-line community for registered users to participate in discussions, get feedback from their peers, form virtual communities, and engage in social networking services in the field of fashion; Providing online-non-downloadable, web-based software for facilitating online and local shopping and promotions, and for connecting retailers and consumers | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
| 045 | Online social networking services provided through a fashion community website; Provision of a web site featuring information on fashion; Providing information in the field of fashion trends; Providing a web site featuring information in the field of fashion; Providing on-line information, news, newsfeeds and commentary in the field of fashion; and Online social networking services in the field of fashion; Telecommunication services | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Discovery Shopping PTY LTD
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named DISTRICT8
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 2, 2015 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 2, 2015 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 1, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 1, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 1, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 12, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 12, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 5, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 22, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 22, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 22, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 22, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 15, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 3, 2013 | TAEA | TEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED | — |
| Sep 3, 2013 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 10, 2013 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 5, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |