Drawing for VIRTUAK STACKS SYSTEMS

USPTO serial 86028499

VIRTUAK STACKS SYSTEMS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SMITH, BRIDGETT G
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VIRTUAK STACKS SYSTEMS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jacques Meshell, Esquire

JACQUES MESHELL, ESQUIRE JACQUES N. MESHELL, P.A.3669 PARK LNMIAMI, FL 33133-6826UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Open cloud computing services, namely, open cloud hosting in the nature of scalable and interoperable hosting of computer software, Internet websites, internet web software applications, electronic databases, digital content and business computer software applications of others that are accessible via the Internet; computer technology support services, namely, help desk services, troubleshooting of computer software and network problems, and diagnosing of computer hardware problems in the field of open cloud computing services, namely, open cloud hosting in the nature of scalable open cloud hosting of computer software, Internet websites, Internet web software applications, electronic databases, digital content, and business computer software applications of others that are accessible via the Internet; Infrastructure as a service (IAAS) featuring open standards computer software platforms for creating, managing, and deploying open cloud computing infrastructure services; installation, configuration, and operation of computer software platforms for creating, managing, and deploying cloud computing infrastructure servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 11, 2016MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 11, 2016ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 25, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 23, 2015EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 23, 2015EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 23, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 9, 2015NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 14, 2015NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 14, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 25, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Mar 7, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 2, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 24, 2015XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 23, 2015GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 23, 2015GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 23, 2015CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 23, 2015ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Feb 3, 2015OTHECASE RETURNED TO EXAMINATION—
Feb 3, 2015IUCNNOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED—
Aug 5, 2014NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 10, 2014NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 10, 2014PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 21, 2014NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
May 2, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 2, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 24, 2014XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Apr 23, 2014GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 23, 2014GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 23, 2014CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Mar 25, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 25, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 19, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 2, 2013CEPECOMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION ENTERED—
Nov 27, 2013GEANNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Nov 27, 2013GEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Nov 27, 2013CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED—
Nov 27, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 19, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 15, 2013TAEATEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED—
Aug 15, 2013PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Aug 12, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 8, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance