USPTO serial 86028617
R RAPIDO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- YAO, GRETTA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 118- EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with R RAPIDO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
JUNG-GU, SEOUL, KR
SEOUL, KR
SEOUL, KR
Gumi, Kyongsangbuk-do, KR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Adam D. Resnick
Adam D. Resnick Mosaic Legal Group, PLLC5185 MacArthur Blvd., NW, Suite 350Washington, DC 20016-3341UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Bags specially adapted for holding or carrying calculators; bags and cases for notebook computer; telephone set sheath, namely, carrying cases specially adapted for telephones; bags and cases for cellular phones; bags specially adapted for photographic apparatus; cases especially made for photographic apparatus and instruments; night vision goggles; dust protective goggles and masks; safety goggles; goggles for sports; eyeglasses; sunglasses; eyeglass chains; eyeglass frames; earphones; sports helmets; cases specially adapted for electronic diaries | ACTIVE | — |
| 018 | Calling card cases; business card cases; name card cases and credit card cases; backpacks; rucksacks; travelling bags; travelling trunks; brief cases; suitcases; school bags; handbags; Boston bags, umbrellas; parasols; leather straps; all-purpose carrying bags; baby backpacks; bags for climbers in the nature of all-purpose carrying bags; canes and walking sticks; card wallets; carriers for suits, shirts and dresses; coin purses; hip sacks; key cases; messenger bags; purses; shoulder bags; sport bags; wallets; fur pelts; synthetic fur | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Boots; shoes; sandals; slippers; golf shoes, trousers; suits; dresses; skirts; coats, jackets; jumpers; sweaters; vest; pants; shirts; socks; stockings; gloves; neckties; white shirts; rain coats; polo shirts; t-shirts; blue jeans; cardigans; scarves; caps; sun visors; belts being clothing; pocket squares; cuffs; money belt; fur jacket; sports shirts; clothing for babies, namely, pajamas, jackets, shirts, pants, jumpers; lingerie | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | Sporting articles other than golf articles and climbing articles, namely, nets for sports, hurdles, pitching machines; sport balls; golf bags with or without wheels; sports supports for writs and knees; machines for physical exercises, namely, exercise bands, training bars, rowing machines not for physical therapy purposes; sports gloves, namely, football gloves, baseball gloves; bags especially designed for skis and surfboards; golf clubs; golf gloves; fishing tackle, mascot dolls; board games; teddy bears | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SAMSUNG EVERLAND INCORPORATED
- Other trademarks owned by CHEIL INDUSTRIES INC.
- Other trademarks owned by SAMSUNG C&T CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by CHEIL INDUSTRIES INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named R RAPIDO
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 5, 2016 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 5, 2016 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 17, 2015 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 17, 2015 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 25, 2015 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 25, 2015 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 21, 2015 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 16, 2015 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 9, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 9, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 3, 2015 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 3, 2014 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 2, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 27, 2014 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Feb 28, 2014 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 13, 2014 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 13, 2014 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 12, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 12, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 12, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 6, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 16, 2014 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 16, 2014 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 16, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 16, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 4, 2013 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Oct 28, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 25, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 22, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 12, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 8, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |