USPTO serial 86029690
URETHANE POLYMERS INTERNATIONAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AWRICH, ELLEN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with URETHANE POLYMERS INTERNATIONAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brian E. Turung
BRIAN E. TURUNG FAY SHARPE LLP1228 EUCLID AVECLEVELAND, OH 44115-1834UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Polymer compositions, namely, modified styrene-butadiene polymer, used in the manufacture of commercial and industrial goods; Chemical agent, namely, asphalt release agent; Extender/retarder additives, namely, chemical additives for cement | ACTIVE | — |
| 002 | Floor coating systems primarily comprising polyurethane coatings for floors; Coatings in the nature of industrial sealants for waterproofing, namely, waterproofing polymer coatings; Epoxy coating for use on floors; epoxy primer; Polyurethane coatings for exterior and interior use on a variety of substrates; Coatings in the nature of industrial sealants for waterproofing, namely, acrylic waterproofing coatings; Acrylic-polyurethane coatings for exterior and interior use on a variety of substrates; Coatings in the nature of industrial sealants for waterproofing, namely, polyurethane waterproofing coatings; polymer coating primers; Coatings comprised of cement, namely, latex modified cement coating and acrylic-latex modified cement coating; Exterior surface protective coatings, namely, latex finish and acrylic-latex finish to be applied over cement; acrylic sealer, namely, concrete sealer in the form of a coating; Epoxy coating for use on concrete industrial floors; Acrylic coatings for exterior and interior use on a variety of substrates; Primers; Glazes; Acrylic-fiberglass coating for exterior and interior use on a variety of substrates; Polymer coating primer; Polyurethane hardener, namely, polyurethane coatings for floors; Paint thinner | ACTIVE | — |
| 017 | Polymer sealant for use in connection with the installation of flooring; acrylic sealer, namely, acrylic based sealant | ACTIVE | — |
| 019 | Polymer modified cement | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Urethane Polymers International, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 002
- Other trademarks in Class 017
- Other trademarks in Class 019
- Similar marks named URETHANE POLYMERS INTERNATIONAL
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 5, 2015 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 5, 2015 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 22, 2014 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 21, 2014 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 20, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 19, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 19, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 22, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 21, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 20, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 13, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |